Offline
Everybody here saw this coming a mile away. Protesting in Boston today, hopefully Trump’s agitators are properly out numbered.
Offline
Al Capone would discuss putting someone on Ice. If he only knew how advanced his thinking really was.
Offline
Anon wrote:
These aren’t your parents’ Ice Capades.
True, but SAD.
Offline
Is it a good thing I have not seen lakes ice over since 1979?
Offline
No problem. We simply look through the holes.
Offline
Explains why so many "hot heads" need bigger guns. Even in a Minneapolis winter.
Offline
The same amount it takes for everyone. That's not something that draws any distinction between people.
Offline
Anon wrote:
what it takes to stop a two ton weaponized vehicle… only about a third of an ounce of lead.
So ICE agents should commit suicide?
Offline
Thelma and Louise did not go about shooting innocent people because they were entitled. Even police (being honest) cannot fire upon a fleeing bank robbers who has no gun. Both common sense and the law. But then one who even praises Al Capone says his power to fire upon anyone is limited by his own "morality". Somebody said so. So it must be true.
Offline
tw wrote:
…Even police (being honest) cannot fire upon a fleeing bank robbers who has no gun. Both common sense and the law….
That’s neither common sense nor the law. IAW the US Supreme Court in Tennessee v. Garner:
JUSTICE WHITE delivered the opinion of the Court.
This case requires us to determine the constitutionality of the use of deadly force to prevent the escape of an apparently unarmed suspected felon. We conclude that such force may not be used unless it is necessary to prevent the escape and the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others.
Using firearm possession by a perp as shoot / no shoot criteria is a red herring. The criteria is a significant threat which can be posed by any means including vehicles.
Offline
... and the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury to the officer or others.
Video clearly desmonstrates that no such condition existed. Ofiicer was standing untouched as the vehciles passed to his left. Even most of his bullets entered through side windows. He was not even in front of the vehicle when firing only in anger.
Only an extremist will not see what is obvious. And so again, your post contracts what only extremists order the most naive to believe. Patriotic Americans (moderates) instead see what is clearly obvious. An agent doing even what the ICE manual says he must not do.
Why is the state banned from this investigation? State lawmen are always involved in investigations involving the FBI. But then honesty might exist. Extremists fired all senior management in the FBI. Replacing all with right wing extremists. If the state was part of this investigation, then honesty might happen. And it might then have integrity. That is not the purpose of righteous extremism.
Last edited by tw (1/16/2026 3:15 pm)
Offline
How terrible for you. My condolences.