do me next

the last meaningful contribution you made was adding your cum to some poor neighborhood kid's ass

you did save up for three weeks in order to make it a big contribution, i'll grant you that

btw contributing isn't posting when nobody wanted you to and nobody asked you to

contributing is putting something in the tip jar and you're about 25 years due

quiz question, how far deep in the mud does your dick have to go before it provides a dependable electrical ground?

who hangs out with children and tries to engage them? pedo Tom. he wants everyone to be children so he can get off

Then he made a poll asking how long to keep them off Twitter, and when it said he should reinstate them immediately, he said it had too many options and made a new poll.

Last edited by Happy Monkey (12/16/2022 1:28 pm)

Flint, are you in favor of doxxing now?

Here are the details

A doxxer developed a technique to figure out the flight times and locations of Musk's private jet. He posts them on Twitter.

Using that information, a Musk stalker followed the car that drove away from the jet that had just landed, and threatened the occupants. Don't knew the details of the threatening.

Turned out Musk wasn't in the car -- but his infant son was.

So Musk said that real-time doxxing would no longer be permitted on Twitter, banned the account that doxxes his jet locations, and said legal action would be forthcoming.

The account then moved to post Elon's flight information on Trump's platform, Truth Social.

The journalists got together to link to the kid's page where the doxxing was happening. Then the journalists were suspended.

Interesting thing, originally the FAA made all the flight information public information, and at that point Musk was probably okay with it, because what are you gonna do? It was legal. Then the FAA said they would make the information private, and the details would be scrambled every month; I'm probably overshortening this description; but the doxxer was then able to hack the flight movements by combining other identifiers.

Now, why shit-flinging monkey left all this important contextual information out

I don't know

and why I took twenty minutes to compile it, to inform you of it

I really really don't know

But I'm against that doxxing; I believe it's probably criminal. And I would have suspended those journalists. How 'bout you

Last edited by Undertoad (12/16/2022 6:21 pm)

I'd say there was a rather important bit of context missing there, yeah.

Interestingly, according to Wikipedia, the guy just linked a public database to a twitter bot. What a world.

Anyway, I'm assuming most people still have a generally unfavorable impression of "banning journalists from talking about a thing that happened," and, if that's become a thing that people are okay with, we should just go ahead and let a nuclear missile exchange put us out of our misery.
 

Musk has also just suspended Business Insider reporter Linette Lopez, who did not post anything related to Elon's jet. She did, however, recently document several examples of times when Musk encouraged or actively participated in the doxxing of people he did not like.

*shrug* Which, like, whatever. He's got the right to suspend anyone he wants on his site. As someone recently pointed out, there's no way William Randolph Hearst would have let someone shit all over him in his own newspaper, either. (The punchline being that if you wanted to shit all over William Randolph Hearst, you had to make a whole Citizen Kane about it.)

Clodfobble wrote:

Musk has also just suspended Business Insider reporter Linette Lopez, who did not post anything related to Elon's jet. She did, however, recently document several examples of times when Musk encouraged or actively participated in the doxxing of people he did not like.

what was she suspended for?

that question is bait. nobody knows what she is suspended for unless/until she reveals it. it should be known to her; Musk has pledged to make reasons for suspensions more transparent.

but many are saying she was banned "for" writing critical articles; this is how a narrative is driven. let's see what comes out next.

Happy Monkey wrote:

Then he made a poll asking how long to keep them off Twitter, and when it said he should reinstate them immediately, he said it had too many options and made a new poll.

new poll was just "now" or "seven days"

"now" wins

and so the people have spoken and the suspension ends now
 

The "doxxing" excuse was justified by claiming that his car was followed by a stalker on the night between Dec 13-14.  The last tweet from @elonjet was on the 12th.  Maybe his kid was driven around from the airport for a full day trying to shake its tail.