The thread is anticipatory not analytical, people are voting based on expectation. This will be a good place to watch.

Define correct, that's where the rub is. I would say do what's legal, but that doesn't quite define it either.

personally i really don't like that an unelected superlegislature-for-life gets to decide whether or not i have rights

griff wrote:

I think we're into Politics as religion here.

More accurately, religion imposed on everyone else by subverting politics.

Most all Supreme Court justices are Catholics.  So the Pope will tell us what to think.


 

"Stacking" the Supreme Court may be the only solution to the perfect storm of factors that have made it a political tool of the far right.
The worst of those factors, of course, was the opportunity that the worst president in history had to name three justices.
With the shameless collusion of a derelict majority in the Senate, we are stuck with them.
While the lifetime appointment may be in the constitution, the size of the court is not.

As opposed to?