cellar2007a
The Cellar: a friendly neighborhood coffee shop, with no coffee and no shop. Established 1990.

You are not logged in. Would you like to login or register?

6/23/2024 1:49 am  #1


No, it probably won't be there

It's easier to copy the URL of something you might want later than download and store it.
But will it be there? If no tin the wayback machine, it might not.





 


 Freedom is just another word for nothin' left to lose.
 
 

6/23/2024 11:03 am  #2


Re: No, it probably won't be there

I have often worried about how much crap is taking up whatever storage there is.
Can't worry about the lost stuff from 2013 when since then 145 quintillion pieces of new crap has been posted.

 

6/23/2024 11:37 am  #3


Re: No, it probably won't be there

It is impossible to find URLs elsewhere that reference a changed or deleted website.  Webmasters of those other cites often make no effort to confirm hyperlinks are valid.  That would cost money.  Business school graduates don't like that.

Many IT people do not get it.  They just arbitrarily change URLs for the same information.  Since the naive always assume change is good.  Even if information has a new URL, the old URL should still reference it.  At least for the next ten years.  But that means a IT guy understands how the world really works.  Many only understand what they feel.
 

 

6/24/2024 7:54 am  #4


Re: No, it probably won't be there

Some information should be removed.

I was so frustrated during the pandemic trying to get good information about specific situations after a covid exposure or covid test result, and every single search I did gave me information that was months out of date.  I'd be looking for current CDC recommendations, and there were a million pages that said they were "current" but had dates well in the past. Once information is old and has been superseded, it should be archived somehow.  Flagged so search engines ignore it unless you put "archived" in your search query.

 

6/25/2024 6:47 am  #5


Re: No, it probably won't be there

glatt wrote:

Some information should be removed.

I was so frustrated during the pandemic trying to get good information about specific situations after a covid exposure or covid test result, and every single search I did gave me information that was months out of date.  I'd be looking for current CDC recommendations, and there were a million pages that said they were "current" but had dates well in the past. Once information is old and has been superseded, it should be archived somehow.  Flagged so search engines ignore it unless you put "archived" in your search query.

Yeah, this is a serious issue.I think folks have gotten caught up in the idea of the internet as the repository of all human knowledge but forget that knowledge is evolving. I work in peoples homes and would love to have clear guidance about how soon I can return to a house after people have been sick. I'd also like that guidance to be based on transmission potential rather than boosting the economy.


If you would only recognize that life is hard, things would be so much easier for you. - Louis Brandeis
 

6/25/2024 8:59 am  #6


Re: No, it probably won't be there

griff wrote:

I think folks have gotten caught up in the idea of the internet as the repository of all human knowledge but forget that knowledge is evolving.

Or that so much is deceptive lies.  AI also has this problem.  Where do machines learn?  Those machines do not know how to separate lies from honesty.  Same problem was observed by all - Saddam's WMDs.

Many people still do many do not know what is necessary to have honest facts.  Also notice many who still start smoking cigarettes.  AI is even easier to scam.  And then presents itself as if an expert.

Well at least AI will not smoke.  Not that it is any smarter.
 

 

Board footera