Science is good they'll figure it out. (pun intended) Another branch is Archaeology.
That's not as clear as chemistry or Mechanics of materials, there's a lot of puzzles to solve and amazingly they usually get it right. 
However this one I'm not so sure...


Now I'm not an archaeologist, have never played one on TV, and didn't stay at a motel last night, but I don't see string. 
I see some fibers with a little twist, but that could have been somebody playing with their Saber-Tooth kitten.
Maybe someone started a diet and was distracting themselves from tummy grumbles while watching the Flintstones.
There's a lot of possibilities but string I don't see.

Last edited by xoxoxoBruce (1/23/2021 3:35 am)

henry_quirk wrote:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322530755_Analysis_and_Qualitative_Effects_of_Large_Breasts_on_Aerodynamic_Performance_and_Wake_of_a_Miss_Kobayashi%27s_Dragon_Maid_Character

After studying this at some length I've determined it's about...
A computational fluid dynamics methodology is used to study the salient flow features around the breasts of a human figure and to describe the aerodynamic differences imparted by their geometric presence.

It appears he approached the problem properly.


Except for the hair question the results show...
Large breasts can be notably aerodynamic through the reduction of drag and lift.
The phrase “Flat is Justice” is deficient aerodynamically.
Large breasts do give a consistently notable aerodynamic advantage.
A major shortcoming was the decision to leave the hair present in the models as immovable and solid.
Someone would have to test the aerodynamic gains against the increased weight performance loss.


 

tw wrote:

So why do seagoing tankers have a big breast out in front of the bow?
 

The Bulbous Bow makes the easier to drive thru the water.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulbous_bow

What the fuck are you babbling about, all Henry did was post a link.
Bulbous bows in water have to bearing on tits in air.

Science!!